Re: ? Comyn spouse away from Malise
Regarding Comyn child who was wife regarding Malise of Strathearn, I got theorized in 2005 one to she had been Margaret, defined as partner away from Sir John de- Keith (discover copy regarding post below) who was simply 2ndly e are given in this post: new spouse Emma I would recommend is actually of some other family members, rather than mom of one’s next Earl Malise.
Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , says in part, ‘Malise, Earl away from Strathearn, had a partner Emma, from inside the 1261-1267, whose surname are unknown ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. sometime prior to 1270, to make sure that his widow (Margaret) would have been “available” a little while immediately after Emma.
This was of course a conjecture; it does have the advantage of handling a well-known relationship anywhere between Muriel Keith and you may Reginald le Cheyne. Anymore associated paperwork would however feel desired.
The brand new membership inside Scots Peerage towards class of Keith claims out of Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) which he try believed to provides partnered Comyn, earl of Buchan . This personality, of the unclear (“thought to were”) diversity, can now feel remedied according to research by the following dispensation, old from the Fondi with the 14 Jan 1378/9::
‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 Into the bishop away from Moray. Faculty in order to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, off Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, about impediment so you’re able to relationships as a result of the 3rd and you can next degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step one. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘
Muriel Keith, the near future 2nd spouse from Robert Stewart, 1st Duke away from Albany (d. 1420), was contracted to help you marry Reginald ce Cheyne, son off Sir Reginald ce Cheyne by their partner (because the their own very first spouse), Helen out of Strathearn. If you find yourself there are popular find out here now holes regarding origins out of Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne do display an ancestry from the Comyns. not, that is as well distant to require a great dispensation if Muriel is an excellent-great-high grandd Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1233), which may be the situation in the event that ’s child.
dos. Reginald le Cheyne is actually a great-grandson regarding Marjory Comyn, daughter from Alexander Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1290), child from William Comyn in the above list. Their unique young buck was Malise, Earl out-of Strathearn off 1312 to help you their dying in 1328 , and you may parent from Reginald.
ca. 1270), was just like Marjory Comyn, and hitched 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This would mean the new parentage a€?said to has been’ that Margaret, partner out of Sir John de- Keith, is off you to definitely generation: she’d n’t have already been the d Comyn, Earl from Buchan, but rather off his child Alexander. There’s no research that Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn was indeed hitched far before 1275: while the Lindsay penned,
There is certainly you to definitely discernable foundation on what the partnership anywhere between Reginald ce Cheyne and you will Muriel Keith will have existed: when the Margaret Comyn, spouse out of Sir John de- Keith (d
‘ This new spouse of earl, regarding 1275, try entitled Marjory, as we understand the attesting clause from Zero. curriculum vitae., which can be stated by Wyntoun, Book VIII. chap. vi., getting come the second aunt regarding John Comyn, Earl off Buchan, who discussed for Earl Malise the wedding settlement above mentioned [dated in the London area, April 26, 1293 having their daughter Matilda and you may Robert de Tony, young buck off Ralph].’
Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy E off Buchan We __________________I________________ We III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith We (als We Elizabeth of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We We I We We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith E out-of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony I ______I_______________________ We We We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- E away from Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We ce Cheyne I We I = 2) Sir David We V I We de Graham Sir William de- We We__________ Keith We We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III We We I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke out of Albany)