Significantly, no statistically high differences in enough time-identity orientation score was basically discovered as the a purpose of playing with otherwise non-playing with dating apps plus the confidence interval just incorporated just what you’ll meet the requirements due to the fact null or brief effect designs (d = –0
Response: You certainly will the fresh new reviewer justify as to why he or she considers the final 3 months once the a far too brief windows? From our attitude, this timeframe are a sufficient give up between a couple need. I have outlined which on Approach section (pp. 7-8, contours 181-190).
I put an extent out of three months due to the fact whatever you considered a damage anywhere between a few demands: To look at most recent pages whenever you are however which have a massive adequate test dimensions. That have offered timeframes, the definition off ‘current use’ try diluted. Having a much stricter schedule, just how many current users would not be adequate towards the designed data, while the meaning of ‘current use’ will be misleading (consider the circumstances if you require include in the final twenty four hours and you will a very energetic representative without Connection to the internet in the the earlier day).
176-181 Pages/non-users to the enough time-title mating positioning: “thought to be small impact products”. Since CI has no, no further records would-be expected. Next, this element of reporting would be headlined individually (descriptive?), up until the regression was shown.
It’s different to you will need to identify the fresh sociodemographic and you can character properties regarding charmdate relationship software profiles (Castro et al
Response: Once more, we have been astonished from the reviewer’s comment. Could the fresh reviewer, delight, provide a resource regarding the as to why not profile are expected when the effect try statistically low-extreme? It’s first analytical education you to definitely non-rejecting the new null theory (zero effect on the inhabitants) is not equivalent you to definitely affirming this new null hypothesis. The new believe interval refers to every thinking that cannot end up being thrown away considering the readily available facts. We simply cannot discard brand new 0 impact (that’s why we are really not rejecting new null theory), but we in addition to usually do not discard almost every other viewpoints. We can’t declare that let me reveal proof of zero effect, but that people discovered evidence of zero impact otherwise extremely small effect.
No findings should be consumed in the results, e.g. 184: “short-label behavior”. The research was dealing with the fresh new SOI-R, which is reported to be a short-label mating level, the show would be discussing the size.
Response: It’s obviously listed that the answers are referring to SOI-R (find p. 9, contours 233-234): “When it comes to mating orientation, the individuals using software displayed high score in all about three SOI-Roentgen dimensions”. When we assume an acceptable legitimacy of your own SOI-R (as there are need not question about it, given that numerous earlier in the day books has actually validated that it size), we can’t discover problem of composing ‘short-identity behavior’, mostly if it is completely obvious we are employing one to dimensions on the SOI-R.
Response: For people, it was unclear exactly what the reviewer wants me to shorten. I described in the main text message this new Table 1. From our knowledge of what is a proper redaction out-of a beneficial manuscript, efficiency shouldn’t be only displayed within the dining tables, plus acceptably described in the main text message (age.grams., APA Direction). For that reason, some tips about what i performed.
On Regression: Very first, it appears to be odd compared to Castro (2020), that investigation wasn’t included in there, and/otherwise 2nd, that’s is than the overall performance.
Response: The research issues we tried to address when you look at the Castro mais aussi al. (2020) while the expose manuscript will vary, and so the newest performance lack built in Castro ainsi que al. (2020). , 2020) rather than make an effort to determine if users and you may non-profiles disagree when you look at the mating positioning.