To compare all of our 2nd theory, we basic recoded, for each of the things that with the reputation level, the part of solutions you to show if husbands have less, equal or higher results, particularly, condition, having hypogamy, which means that husbands has actually straight down standing than simply spouses, homogamy, meaning equal standing, and you may hypergamy, definition husbands which have highest status than spouses. Into the sitios de citas para adultos mayores prospective organization off country, analyses have been extreme in the degree (X dos =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you can monetary feeling away from a possible split up (X 2 =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Data showed that, for Foreign-language members, there is certainly even more education hypogamy, while getting Dominican participants there is a great deal more training homogamy. Concerning economic items in case there is divorce case, while there is alot more homogamy to have Spanish professionals, you will find so much more hypergamy for Dominicans (get a hold of Profile step one).
With previous marriages or not was not relevant to help you differences in updates. Concerning possible connection between status and you can years married, significant associations had been used in health (X dos =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though to own people y is available (40.4%, each), to possess people y is present (43.4%). This means that, into class with increased many years partnered, husbands enjoys lower health position. Which have people away from previous marriages and having youngsters away from latest matrimony failed to notably connect with condition.
Inside sum, the analyses in regards to the 2nd hypothesis showed that in contrast to the expectations, the largest feature relevant in order to updates is the country.
Univariate evaluating revealed high variations in factor step one (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
Ultimately, hypogamy circumstances within the The country of spain scored significantly lower than hypogamy issues during the Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).