Profile 1. Extreme Sex X Attachment category (AAI) out-of Rejecting and Forgetting caregiving (likely choices scales), and you can Frustration to your co-mother (state of mind level), coded about P-CAI interviews.
Figure step one. Tall Sex X Accessory class (AAI) of Rejecting and you may Forgetting caregiving (probable choices bills), and you may Fury into co-mother (mood measure), coded regarding the P-CAI interviews.
Univariate negative effects of AAI group, and you will then post-hoc evaluations, is actually displayed inside the Dining table 4. As the hypothesized (H2), there’s a great deal more idealization and derogation of your relationship to the little one one of moms and dads categorized because the Dismissive with respect to accessory (AAI/D), and you can a whole lot more anger into the the kid and in addition rage into the this new co-father or mother certainly one of moms and dads categorized as the Obsessed (AAI/E). Since hypothesized (H3), parental guilt try high among parents classified because the Preoccupied in respect to connection (AAI/E) and also highest getting moms and dads dismissive in terms of connection (AAI/Ds), compared to autonomous (AAI/F) moms and dads. And additionally guaranteeing all of our hypothesis (H4), preoccupying emotions of being refused by the man had been higher among mothers whose latest connection representations was in fact classified given that Dismissive (AAI/Ds).
Published on line:
Desk 4. Differences in parents’ preoccupying feelings away from getting rejected, fury, adult guilt, and you will idealization, dependent on their AAI-category (N = 77).
To address hypothesis 5 concerning differences between mothers’ and dads’ probable caregiving behaviors as revealed in their caregiving representations, MANOVA was carried out with P-CAI probable parenting behaviors loving, rejecting, neglecting and involving (role-reversing) as dependent variables, parent gender (father vs. mother) and parent AAI-classification (Dismissive vs. Preoccupied vs. Autonomous) as grouping variables. Also here, co-parent attachment scriptedness (ASA) was entered as covariate. Besides the expected main multivariate effect of AAI classification (Wilks’?, F(8, 134) = 7.72, p < .0001, ? 2 = .316) on caregiving behaviors, the analysis did reveal a multivariate effect of parent gender (Wilks'?, F(4, 67) = 3.26, p = .017, ? 2 = .163), and also a multivariate gender X AAI-classification interaction effect (Wilks’?, F(8, 134) = 2.57, p = .012, ? 2 = .133). The univariate tests uncovered that both these effects concerned differences, between fathers and mothers, in probable parental rejecting behavior (Mfathers = 2.42, SD = 1.92, Mmothers = 1.74, SD = 1.28). Among parents with Dismissive (AAI/Ds) current attachment representations, there were more rejecting (Figure 1(b)) and more neglecting (Figure 1(c)) behaviors described by fathers in the P-CAI interview, compared to mothers. The multivariate effect of co-parent attachment scriptedness (ASA) was also significant (Wilks’?, F(4, 67) = 4.03, p = .006, ? 2 = .194). Subsequent univariate analysis revealed effects on probable loving (F(step 1, 70) = , p < .0001, ? 2 = .186) and rejecting (F(1, 70) = 6.12, p = .015, ? 2 = .080), but not on neglecting and involving behaviors. Thus, elaborate and readily available attachment scripts in the co-parent are associated with more evidence of probable loving and less evidence of probable rejecting caregiving behaviors in the interviewed fathers’ and mothers’ caregiving representations.
Dining table 5 gifts a summary of area of the aftereffects of mother gender and you will mother accessory class, respectively, and you may relationships among them, in addition to ramifications of co-mother or father attachment scriptedness, on the a lot more than analyses.
Blogged online:
In a final, exploratory round, and drawing upon the finding that probable experiences of a rejecting father were negatively associated to parents’ chances of receiving an Autonomous classification with respect to their own caregiving representations (P-CAI/F), the possibility of differences in mothers’ and fathers’ childhood experiences of rejection by their fathers was tested. ANOVA with parent gender (male vs. female) and P-CAI classification (Autonomous vs. Dismissive vs. Preoccupied) as grouping variables, and the AAI subscale coding probable rejection by the father as dependent variable was carried out. In addition to a main effect of parent gender (F(1, 70) = 8.81, p < .005, ? 2 = .11) indicating that, compared to mothers, fathers' adult attachment representations (AAI) included significantly higher amounts of rejection by their own fathers (Mfather = 3.57, SD = 2.29; Mmother = 2.61, SD = 1.89), the analysis revealed a tendency of a P-CAI classification X gender interaction (F(2, 70) = 2.92, p < .06, ? 2 = .09). Among parents whose caregiving representations were classified as Dismissive or Preoccupied with respect to parental caregiving, fathers reported childhood experiences of rejection by their fathers to a larger extent than mothers did (Figure 1(d)).