• P is the significance level of the factor (n.s.: not significant; *<0·05; **<0·01; ***<0·001). % is the percentage of variability explained by the factor. Factors that have not been considered in the model are represented with a dash (–).

• a roentgen: resistant; S: vulnerable.
• b Level of inoculated seedlings.
• c Imply wilting payment ± SE.
• d Emails title homogeneous teams by the Fisher’s LSD attempt (P = 0·05).

Hydraulic conductivity and you will susceptability so you can cavitation

Vulnerability to cavitation (P₅₀ and P₈₀), Kx_maximum and absolute conductivity (Kx) did not differ significantly among the types of crosses (Fig. 1; Table 3). Loss of conductivity began at ?0·3 MPa and progressed at a similar rate in all crosses, i.e. there were no differences in the slope of VCs (P = 0·87; Table 3).

• a WP 20 d.a.i., wilting percentage 20 days after inoculation; VC slope, ‘a’ parameter of the exponential sigmoid: PLC = 100/(1 + exp[a(??b)]); P₅₀, applied pressure at which the sample loses 50% hydraulic conductance; P₈₀, applied pressure at which the sample loses 80% hydraulic conductance; Kx_max, maximum xylem specific conductivity; VL_max, maximum vessel length; bVL, vessel length distribution parameter; WD, wood density; VD, vessel diameter; VTA, vessel transectional area; THC, relative theoretical hydraulic conductance; VF, vessel frequency; (t/b) 2 , resistance to implosion; PGV, percentage of grouped vessels; VPG, vessels per group; VGA, vessel groups per area; CLVF, contribution of large vessels (VD >70 ?m) to flow; CMVF, contribution of medium vessels (40 < VD < 70 ?m) to flow; CSVF, contribution of small vessels (VD <40 ?m) to flow. Lees verder →