I can understand the fear of governments forcing porn sites to move , and thus bringing us into the realm of “what exactly defines porn”, but if it can stay as optional as choosing a domain, then I don’t see a large downfall. I’m sure others will disagree with me, though, and reply as such. (I welcome this, as someone may talk about a point I haven’t thought of.)
Re: ( Score: 2)
If you want to include sites aimed primarily at adults that aren’t porn, then isn’t the best top-level domain for them. I can think of only a handful of domains that could work,.adult seeming to be an obvious choice, but since can work for those sites as well, why do we need an adult-only domain name again?
Nope ( Score: 3, Insightful)
The problem isn’t filtering content. The problem is that domain names are a terrible way to do it (see RFC 3675 [faqs.org]), and there are better ways of doing it (see PICS [w3.org]).
As for a , the public and legislators will misunderstand its limitations. Lees verder