Significantly, no statistically high differences in enough time-identity orientation score was basically discovered as the a purpose of playing with otherwise non-playing with dating apps plus the confidence interval just incorporated just what you’ll meet the requirements due to the fact null or brief effect designs (d = –0
Response: You certainly will the fresh new reviewer justify as to why he or she considers the final 3 months once the a far too brief windows? From our attitude, this timeframe are a sufficient give up between a couple need. I have outlined which on Approach section (pp. 7-8, contours 181-190).
I put an extent out of three months due to the fact whatever you considered a damage anywhere between a few demands: To look at most recent pages whenever you are however which have a massive adequate test dimensions. That have offered timeframes, the definition off ‘current use’ try diluted. Having a much stricter schedule, just how many current users would not be adequate towards the designed data, while the meaning of ‘current use’ will be misleading (consider the circumstances if you require include in the final twenty four hours and you will a very energetic representative without Connection to the internet in the the earlier day).
176-181 Pages/non-users to the enough time-title mating positioning: “thought to be small impact products”. Since CI has no, no further records would-be expected. Next, this element of reporting would be headlined individually (descriptive?), up until the regression was shown.
It’s different to you will need to identify the fresh sociodemographic and you can character properties regarding charmdate relationship software profiles (Castro et al
Response: Once more, we have been astonished from the reviewer’s comment. Lees verder