The descriptive statistics for the two dimensions (see Table 2) indicated that the conflict and closeness values varied between the maximum and minimum possible values of the scale (i.e. 40 and 8, and 35 and 7, respectively), while the STRS total score varied between the maximum and almost the minimum possible values of the scale (i.e. 75 and 15). Although the analysis of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test indicated that these scales do not have a normal distribution, the skewness and kurtosis values showed that they are not far from normality. In fact, the teachers reported significantly higher scores on the closeness subscale, than on the conflict subscale, F(1, 534) = , p < .001.
Cronbach’s leader expressed high internal surface off argument and you can closeness size ([alpha] = .87, and you may [alpha] = .86, respectively) plus in the newest STRS complete score ([alpha] = .84). The object-total correlation varied compatible partners mobil between .49 and you will .69 in all items in one another subscales, and you will inter-product correlations ranged anywhere between .twenty-seven and you may .63, indicating that most items are strongly related to these subscales.
The latest exploratory grounds research, that have a main components extraction approach and you will Varimax rotation, served the initial two-foundation services of the Pianta (1992). It one or two-grounds solution accounted for % out-of overall difference (get a hold of Desk step three). The 2 circumstances exhibited Eigenvalues regarding cuatro.62 and you will step 3.61, and you may taken into account % and you will % of your full variance, correspondingly to have dispute and you will closeness.
However, brand new percentile viewpoints each subscale and for the overall score revealed that brand new instructors usually view the student-professor relationships positively
On confirmatory foundation analysis, we tested the newest model complement the 2-foundation model. That it very first design (Model A beneficial) displayed satisfactory complement list thinking (CFI = .ninety-five, GFI = .ninety, RMSEA = 0.07, [chi square]/df = 2.32), however, around three sets from mistakes in the same dimensions got higher amendment indicator. Thus, we checked-out an extra design and in case correlations of them problems (Model B, Shape step one), and a good fit try attained (CFI = .96, GFI = .93, RMSEA = 0.05, [chi square]/df = step one.65; Hu Bentler, 1999).
The relation between the conflict and closeness subscales was weak but significant and negative (r = -.15, p < .001). The relation between the subscales and the STRS total score was also significant, but strong and negative with the conflict subscale (r = -.77, p < .001) and strong and positive with the closeness subscale (r = .74, p < .001).
The brand new instructors having children in the 1st levels had better relationships ([beta] = –
The fresh new ratio out-of men and women students chose by educators differed during the reason for the gender, we.e., people coaches chose a great deal more people than simply male people and you may male teachers chose much more male than female youngsters, [chi-square](1) = 5.034, p = .025.
80, p < .001, and overall student-teacher relationship, t(525) = 3.67, p < .001, depending on the student's gender. Teachers reported less conflict in student-teacher relationships with the female students (M = , SD = 4.63) than male students (M = , SD = 5.75), and globally better student-teacher relationships with female students (M = , SD = 7.37) than male students (M = , SD = 8.34). There was no statistical evidence of a significant difference in closeness in student-teacher relationships by students' gender, t(525) = 1.76, p = .079.
The regression model indicated that the students’ grade level was significantly associated with the closeness subscale, F(1, 518) = , p < .001, and the STRS total scale, F(1, 518) = 9.23, p = .003, but not with the conflict subscale, F(1, 518) = 0.00, p = .991. 21, CI = -.83 - -.35) and better student-teacher relationships overall ([beta] = -.13, CI = -.97 -.21), than the teachers with students in the more advanced grades.